Episode 24 - Does Hit Rate Matter in Nature Photography?
- Michael Rung
- Apr 7
- 7 min read
A practical look at keeper rate, intentional shooting, creative experimentation, and long-term growth in landscape and nature photography
In episode 24 of Shutter Nonsense, Michael and Jeffrey take a closer look at the idea of hit rate in nature photography and whether it is actually a meaningful measure of success. What starts as a discussion about keeper percentages quickly turns into a broader conversation about intention in the field, the difference between mindless overshooting and creative experimentation, and why a low hit rate is not always a bad thing.
The episode also explores how photographers cull images, revisit old files, and grow over time through trial, error, and evolving vision. For nature photographers who have ever wondered whether they are taking too many photos or not coming home with enough keepers, this conversation offers a more thoughtful way to evaluate progress that goes far beyond the numbers.
Join the fun! All Patreon members, whether free or paid, can participate in our community chats for each episode (select paid tiers also gain access to new episodes a week early). Don't miss out!
Contents
Listen or Watch Now
Or find us on your favorite podcast app: just search for Shutter Nonsense!
Episode Summary
In episode 24 of Shutter Nonsense, Michael and Jeffrey take on a topic that many landscape photographers and nature photographers think about, even if they do not always say it out loud: hit rate. How many images from a trip actually turn into keepers? Is a low keeper rate a sign of weak field technique, or can it simply reflect experimentation, growth, and creative risk?
Their conversation moves past the surface-level numbers and gets to something far more useful. Instead of treating photography hit rate as a scorecard, they explore what it reveals about intention, editing, and long-term artistic development. For photographers who have ever come home from a trip with hundreds or thousands of files and wondered whether that was good or bad, this episode offers a grounded perspective.
What a Photography Hit Rate Really Means
At its simplest, hit rate refers to the percentage of photos from a shoot or trip that survive the culling process and feel worth editing or keeping. In landscape photography and nature photography, that idea sounds straightforward. In practice, it is not.
Michael describes a period in his earlier photography where he used a fast, reactive approach in the field. He would shoot constantly, move quickly, and trust volume over contemplation. That method produced lots of frames, but not many strong images. Over time, as he slowed down and became more deliberate with composition and decision-making, his keeper rate improved.
That change seemed positive at first. Fewer frames. More successful images. Better field craft. But the discussion does not stop there, because a higher hit rate is not always proof that a photographer is improving in the right way.
Why a High Keeper Rate Can Be Misleading
One of the strongest ideas in the episode is that a very high hit rate can sometimes signal the opposite of growth. If a photographer only works inside a narrow comfort zone, the results may be more consistent, but the work may also become predictable. Fewer misses can mean fewer risks.
That is where Michael and Jeffrey push the conversation into more useful territory. They distinguish between careless overshooting and intentional experimentation. Randomly firing off frames without thinking is one thing. Trying new compositions, pushing into unfamiliar subjects, or exploring a different creative direction is something else entirely.
For nature photographers, that distinction matters. Experimentation may lower the keeper rate in the short term, but it can also lead to stronger work over time. A low hit rate is not automatically a failure. Sometimes it is evidence that a photographer is learning.
The Difference Between Mindless Shooting and Intentional Play
A recurring theme in the episode is intentionality. Both hosts acknowledge that it is easy to stand at a scene and keep pressing the shutter button while waiting for light to change, even when nothing meaningful is happening. That habit creates more files, more culling, and more wasted time on the back end.
What they advocate instead is a more thoughtful approach. That means slowing down, observing the scene, and deciding whether an image is actually worth making. It also means recognizing the difference between boredom-driven shooting and creative play.
Intentional play is still experimental, but it has purpose. A photographer might try a new angle, a different focal length, or an unfamiliar subject because there is genuine curiosity there. That kind of experimentation can absolutely produce misses, but those misses are valuable. They come from trying to see better, not from avoiding stillness.
For landscape photographers, that is an important mindset shift. The goal is not simply to reduce the number of frames. The goal is to make each frame more considered.
How Keepers Are Chosen After a Trip
The episode also offers a useful look at what happens after the shoot. Michael talks through his culling process in Lightroom, where he narrows images down in stages rather than making a final judgment all at once. Technical issues matter, of course. Missed focus, weak edges, awkward balance, and distracting elements can all push an image out of contention.
But beyond the technical side, there is also instinct. Some images survive because they simply feel stronger. Others are left as possibilities for later, even if they do not make the immediate cut.
That matters because a keeper is not always a fixed category. A file that looks unremarkable right after a trip may feel much more promising a year later. Editing skills change. Taste evolves. Creative vision matures. A photograph that once felt weak may reveal something new over time.
Why Revisiting Old Photos Matters
Jeffrey and Michael both point to the value of revisiting the archive. That may be one of the most useful takeaways from the episode, especially for photographers who are too quick to judge their own work.
Old files are not just leftovers from a missed opportunity. Sometimes they are unfinished opportunities.
A photographer might return to them later with better processing skills, a more refined eye, or a different sense of what makes an image compelling. In that context, hit rate becomes even harder to define because the final judgment is not always made right away.
This is especially relevant in nature photography, where subtle scenes often take time to appreciate. Woodland images, intimate landscapes, and quieter compositions may not announce themselves immediately. Some photographs need distance before their strengths become clear.
Growth in Nature Photography Is Bigger Than the Numbers
By the end of the discussion, the main conclusion is clear. Hit rate can be useful, but only when it is treated as a clue rather than a verdict. If a photographer is overshooting mindlessly, the number might point to a real problem in the field. But if the lower percentage comes from experimentation, curiosity, or creative stretching, it may be part of healthy growth.
Michael and Jeffrey both make the case that process matters more than percentage. Are photographers becoming more intentional? Are they learning to recognize what works in two dimensions? Are they pushing beyond repetition and staying engaged with the craft?
Those are the questions that actually matter. A nature photographer cannot measure artistic success by keeper rate alone. Field awareness, composition, editing judgment, and creative evolution all count for more.
The Real Takeaway From Episode 24
Episode 24 of Shutter Nonsense turns a numbers-based question into a much more meaningful conversation about photography growth. Instead of obsessing over the percentage of keepers from a trip, Michael and Jeffrey argue for a more thoughtful standard: work with intention, experiment with purpose, and judge progress by depth of seeing rather than raw output.
For landscape photographers and nature photographers, that is a far healthier benchmark. Hit rate may tell part of the story, but it never tells the whole thing.
Related Links
Support the Podcast
We have been pursuing our passion for nature and landscape photography for over a decade each. Developing Shutter Nonsense has required plenty of time, patience, and monetary investment, all of which falls on top of our existing efforts (and expenses) to manage our nature photography businesses. Without our supporters, producing the podcast on an ongoing basis would not be possible.
Every contribution, no matter the amount, allows us to continue recording new episodes for your ongoing enjoyment, education, and entertainment. Your support goes directly to covering the costs of our website, hosting and distributing the podcast itself, recurring charges for recording and editing software, and more.
Become a member of our Patreon to earn exclusive perks, such as member shoutouts, free merch, and other benefits. Paying Patreon members are also able to submit questions, topics, and more for exclusive episodes that are only available to them.
Join the Community
Even if you're not ready to become a paid supporter, you can still join our Patreon for free to engage with us! Every episode will have a corresponding community post where you can ask questions, provide feedback, or share your own stories and experiences related to topics we discuss.
Follow your Shutter Nonsense Hosts
Michael Rung
Michael is a nature and landscape photographer based in Texas, with a deep appreciation for quiet forests and the unique character of trees. His photography often explores the subtle beauty in overlooked scenes, capturing atmosphere and emotion through careful composition and light. Michael brings thoughtful insight, honest reflections, and a grounded perspective to every episode of Shutter Nonsense.
Jeffrey Tadlock
Jeffrey is a landscape photographer from Ohio who finds inspiration in waterfalls, scenic overlooks, and the ever-changing light of the natural world. He enjoys sharing stories from the field and helping others improve their skills through practical, experience-based tips. With a passion for teaching and a love of the outdoors, Jeffrey brings clarity and encouragement to fellow photographers at all levels.
